4 ms·
Even though this sounds plausible, it's actually false. The counterxample is the first uncountable ordinal ω₁ [1], viewed as a well-ordered set (and thus a fort
by ontario 12y ago
Even though this sounds plausible, it's actually false. The counterxample is the first uncountable ordinal ω₁ [1], viewed as a well-ordered set (and thus a fortiori totally ordered). For every a,b in ω₁, the closed interval [a,b] is countable (by definition), but ω₁ itself is not.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_uncountable_ordinal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_uncountable_ordinal
- rtpg 12y agoah, I remember seeing that in a set theory book I was struggling through at one point. Might be worth a second try so that I don't miss this