3 ms·
They just don't have much music. I tried spotify as a youtube substitute a few months back (at a friends house). Turns out they don't have a single song I searc
by mrottenkolber 12y ago
They just don't have much music. I tried spotify as a youtube substitute a few months back (at a friends house). Turns out they don't have a single song I searched for (all available on youtube, well known genre classics).
- mod 12y agoI don't have this problem in the genres I listen to--they have only not had a couple of songs from pretty obscure groups. Even when I create a station by artist, say The Avett Brothers (considered folk music, I believe), I end up getting repeats quickly--even among the non-Avett artists playing on the station. My own personal folk playlist (on spotify) has more variety than their own station. I'm convinced it's an algorithm issue in my case. In yours, possibly lack of choices.
- tragic 12y agoIt really depends, probably on the labels concerned. My own short, happy, musical career is documented in full - that is, eight tracks on obscuro progressive house labels from 2008-2011. Nobody will ever want to listen to them, except me. (I never saw a cent, but since they're all diplomatically categorised as '< 1000 streams', that would add up to one laughable payday: and besides, I never saw a cent from the labels either.) I know a lot of older house/trance etc tracks, including genre classics, are stuck in licensing hell after the labels folded, and I would expect that to be the more true the further back in musical history you go. If I get back into things, I'll probably just give the MP3s away. There's no money in music, and I earn a living elsewise.