4 ms·
I suppose that depends on whether the customer thinks they're getting $500/mo of value out of the product :) If they don't, I certainly wouldn't fault them for
by yurisagalov 12y ago
I suppose that depends on whether the customer thinks they're getting $500/mo of value out of the product :) If they don't, I certainly wouldn't fault them for not buying the product.
- TheLoneWolfling 12y agoIt's different when you're adding another person and it's adding an additional 15$/month, and adding an additional 500$/month - even if overall it ends up being the same per person overall for both. Think of it this way. If you've got 30 people, you're using this product. Then you add another person. Now all of a sudden you've got 500$/month expenditures suddenly appearing. The sudden appearance is much more likely to push people to alternative routes than a gradual increase.
- sgrove 12y agoThat's madness. What's the payroll for 30 people? $500/month isn't going to put a dent in that.
- TheLoneWolfling 12y agoIt's not much, compared to other expenses, yes. But that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that someone is much more likely to look around for alternatives to do something if an expanse suddenly pops up than if an expense gradually does.
- _dark_matter_ 12y agoSeems like a good point. What it should be is an increased gradient for the next 30 customers, i.e. after 30, each additional is $30 a month, and then after 60, each additional is back to $15. This would get rid of the cliff at 30, but still give you guys the same revenue at 60.