Personally I thought the article was well written and understandable. Bill to allow books to be translated for blind people (in deference to copyright law) is

Personally I thought the article was well written and understandable. Bill to allow books to be translated for blind people (in deference to copyright law) is getting passed There is an attempt to link this bill to another bill that allows performers (who more or less have to yield their rights to their studios) to demand removal of their performance (and thereby, the work in question) from public view. So, linking a good law (let us translate this for the blind) to a terrible law (this film features me (one of our performers), so you MUST take it down) so that it has some hope of passing. Maybe I don't understand what you don't understand, did what I just write help?