3 ms·
Your point seemed to be that the first of the studies you picked was based on estimates for things like total lifetime and decommissioning. But the fact that t
by lotsofmangos 12y ago
Your point seemed to be that the first of the studies you picked was based on estimates for things like total lifetime and decommissioning.
But the fact that the first thing you picked relied on estimates for those things tells us nothing at all about the quality of the data, just that estimates were used for something where estimates are always used.
- maxerickson 12y agoI suppose my point was that it is unfortunate that so much context is lost by the time a chart ends up in Wikipedia. At a minimum, they should probably get rid of some of the decimal places in their table. I was not trying to paint it as likely that the other studies would be similar to the one I looked at (I see why my phrasing doesn't necessarily communicate that, but I was simply trying to say that I hadn't done more than look at the 1 study).