3 ms·

Here's some more: http://www.asx.com.au/documents/asx-compliance/the_bottom_line_corporate_performance_and_womens_representation_on_boards_2004-2008.pdf http:/

by tomlock 12y ago

Here's some more: http://www.asx.com.au/documents/asx-compliance/the_bottom_line_corporate_performance_and_womens_representation_on_boards_2004-2008.pdf http://www.asx.com.au/documents/asx-compliance/the_bottom_li... https://finsia.com/news/news-article/2015/03/13/boardroom-gender-diversity-improves-company-performance https://finsia.com/news/news-article/2015/03/13/boardroom-ge... http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/do-more-women-on-the-board-mean-better-results http://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/do-more-women-on-...

facepalm 12y ago
Well I just looked at the first paper, and now look at the credit suisse paper I linked in another comment ( https://www.credit-suisse.com/newsletter/doc/gender_diversity.pdf https://www.credit-suisse.com/newsletter/doc/gender_diversit... ) which has charts for 2005 to 2011. There was a "crash" in mid 2007 that somehow reversed the trends for companies with or without women on the board. Before that, zero-woman companies were outperforming the woman-companies. Now it seems rather curious to me that they choose 2004-2008 for their comparison (in the first paper you linked to). So strangely, they catch exactly that crash point in their interval. It's always the same shenanigans...