3 ms·
I thought 12 was a red flag too. Not exactly the standard increment of 5 or 10.
by therealdrag0 12y ago
I thought 12 was a red flag too. Not exactly the standard increment of 5 or 10.
- jsprogrammer 12y agoBecause 5 or 10 is any less arbitrary?
- robzyb 12y agoYes. In this context 5 or 10 are less arbitrary. This is due to their regular usage.
- Steuard 12y agoCertainly not. But they're common defaults. The worry is that if someone picks a non-standard interval, it suggests that they gave conscious thought to what interval to pick and came up with that one. The natural question in that case is why: Is there some economic reason that 12 years would be special, or some matching limitation to their data set? Or did they try every interval between 5 and 20 years and pick the one where the result was most favorable? Edit: But it sounds like it actually was due to the size of the dataset: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9222416 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9222416