4 ms·
Well if you are talking about damage done to forests & noise pollution, then you are trying to capture the externalities of power production into its "true cost
by krschultz 12y ago
Well if you are talking about damage done to forests & noise pollution, then you are trying to capture the externalities of power production into its "true cost".
I'm all for that, but if you decide to do that you also have to use the same methodology for coal, oil, nuclear, etc. Sorry birds, but I feel like the cost of every bird killed by a wind turbine pales in comparison to what a few mountain top removal coal mines do to an area.
In terms of economic ROI for the corporations owning wind turbines, I think it works out even w/o tax credits. Obviously the tax credits help, but the credits are not generous enough to justify all of this investing on their own. I believe the companies have done the analysis and believe it is profitable.
- jonathansizz 12y agoFYI: bird deaths via wind turbines are trivial. Collisions with wind turbines account for about one-tenth of one percent of all "unnatural" bird deaths in the United States each year. http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science/wind-turbine-kill-birds.htm http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/green-science...
- lotsofmangos 12y agoI was thinking about starting the anti-windows party to campaign for banning glass in architecture, just to see how dedicated people are to the premise of reducing bird deaths caused by human structures.