4 ms·
The argument that author makes is "every letter in English alphabet is represented, why not every letter/grapheme in Bengali/Tamil/Telugu/Name your language" ar
by ramviswanadha 12y ago
The argument that author makes is "every letter in English alphabet is represented, why not every letter/grapheme in Bengali/Tamil/Telugu/Name your language" argument is specious at best
- zhemao 12y agoExcept that the whole purpose of Unicode is to create a character encoding that "enables people around the world to use computers in any language" - taken from the Unicode Consortium website. Bengali is also not an obscure language. It is the 10th most spoken language in the world and the national language of Bangladesh.
- zhemao 12y agoAnd besides, the argument isn't "Why aren't all Bengali characters represented when all English characters are?" The argument is "Why aren't all Bengali characters represented when a pile of poo is?"
- webitorial 12y agoNo, the argument is "Why didn't the Unicode authors make the same technical choice I would have based on my limited knowledge of this topic -- including not knowing that the pile of poo was created for use in the Japanese market; as well as not knowing that I could participate myself for just $75, not the $18,000 lie in my story; and not understanding the nuances of international standardization; or reviewing the list of international liaisons to the Unicode organization where much of the language-specific work is done?"
- TheCoelacanth 12y agoBangladesh is a member of the Unicode Consortium. Why haven't they ensured that Bengali is well supported? The Unicode Consortium's job isn't to support every language in the world; it's to coordinate between the multitude of different parties who do the actual work to ensure that they produce can coexist nicely.