3 ms·
When there's lack of objective direct information, the evidence of adoption or "churn" might be a good substitute: http://www.quora.com/Is-LinkedIn-getting-rid-
by jkbyc 12y ago
When there's lack of objective direct information, the evidence of adoption or "churn" might be a good substitute: http://www.quora.com/Is-LinkedIn-getting-rid-of-Scala http://www.quora.com/Is-LinkedIn-getting-rid-of-Scala
Of course, it's difficult to judge LinkedIn's motives but it certainly raises valid questions and concerns.
- discreteevent 12y agoThere is objective and direct information. Study the language and it's libraries. Then look at your needs and make a judgement based on reason. There is no other way around this. You could look at other companies experience but then you would need a large sample size and detailed analysis of why they succeeded or failed. Using a sample size of one web company you might as well study the entrails of a dog and you will get the same results if you make technical decisions like this.