3 ms·
No mention of YCombinator at all, including their reasoning to include or not include it. Seems really strange given that I've never heard of most of these acce
by acconrad 12y ago
No mention of YCombinator at all, including their reasoning to include or not include it. Seems really strange given that I've never heard of most of these accelerators, I would have figured it was YC and TechStars at the top, followed by some larger regional accelerators.
- dalek2point3 12y agoYC opted out. From the Forbes article: http://www.forbes.com/sites/briansolomon/2015/03/17/the-best-startup-accelerators-of-2015-powering-a-tech-boom/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/briansolomon/2015/03/17/the-best... > Those strict criteria kept out one notable program: Y Combinator, which ranked #1 in 2014. Hochberg and Cohen note that Y Combinator, a pioneer whose graduates have included Dropbox, Airbnb, and Reddit, has “evolved” its model into that of a hands-off seed fund. > “Y Combinator is cashing in on the name it made for itself,” says Hochberg. “They’re talking about raising a multi-billion dollar late stage fund to take advantage of their model that selects great entrepreneurs rather than mold them.” > Other accelerators that remain on the rankings are more hands-on than Y Combinator, which by metrics alone would have ranked first again this year. Some entrepreneurs enjoy the relative freedom the program offers, versus highly structured programs elsewhere.
- Syrup-tan 12y agoBut YCombinator was mentioned, albeit as "Y Combinator" instead of "YCombinator" (Making search a bit painful) >Notably absent in this year’s list are Y Combinator and RockHealth–both programs now classify themselves as seed funds rather than accelerators, and asked us to respect their evolution into a new model. >This, of course, is not a statement about efficacy of those programs – based on the 2013 data submitted to the rankings team, Y Combinator would still have topped the list if they had not transitioned models.