3 ms·
As interesting as Ada Lovelace's and Charles Babbage's story is, their efforts have had little (if any) influence on the computer we know today. In a sense, th
by Svip 12y ago
As interesting as Ada Lovelace's and Charles Babbage's story is, their efforts have had little (if any) influence on the computer we know today. In a sense, they are not completely relevant when talking about modern computing. I also feel Lovelace tend to distract the subject on women in computing.
- tormeh 12y agoLikewise Leibniz was the first computer scientist. As if anyone cares.
- MollyR 12y agoI care. I like to know the truth not the marketing angle. Do you mind explaining ?
- andyjohnson0 12y agoProbably a reference to Leibniz having discovered/invented the binary number system back in the 1679 [1]. He also worked on theories of algorithms and designed calculating machines [2]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_number#History http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_number#History [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottfried_Wilhelm_Leibniz#Computation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottfried_Wilhelm_Leibniz#Compu...
- mhurron 12y ago> I also feel Lovelace tend to distract the subject on women in computing. Given that, as someone has already mentioned in the comments, there are people that hold the view that women are always at least second best to a man in regards to ability in computing because they are female, the fact that the first 'programmer' did so without documentation on a machine that existed in theory was a woman is very much central to the subject.
- PJDK 12y agoI agree, really it's Grace Hopper that we should be celebrating as "the woman who founded modern computing", because we're still feeling her influence every day!