4 ms·
Bah. What a clickbait title. If you consider blogger a "nutritionist" then you deserve what you get. The Star Tribune is guilty of posting the exact same level
by forrestthewoods 12y ago
Bah. What a clickbait title. If you consider blogger a "nutritionist" then you deserve what you get. The Star Tribune is guilty of posting the exact same level of crap as the nutritionist bloggers. Any service which generate revenue primarily by generating clicks must be treated with an abundance of caution.
- vdaniuk 12y ago>If you X then you deserve what you get. This attitude is harmful, toxic and wrong. Humans are irrational and reactive, their hehaviour is heavily dependent on the context and mind state. Please reconsider.
- gutnor 12y ago>> If you X then you deserve what you get. > This attitude is harmful, toxic and wrong. But that's how you learn. At some point you need to admit that you -yourself- have lacked in judgment in order to learn something. Not everything can be taught in school, not everything can be protected by law, at some point you need to take some responsibility. What level do you set the bar to ? That the real question. Should we make the blogger be liable, require a license to blog online or special qualification ? If I give the same advise to a mate at the pub, should I be fined ? Setting the bar too low is just creating a tyranny.
- watt 12y agoYou deserve truth. Everybody deserves truth.
- Already__Taken 12y agoI agree with you but there must be a bar there for a multinational company knowingly lying. It's fine (great) to make something unhealthy. Just don't lie about it being healthy. There must be false advertising laws that can already catch them for this?
- Lewton 12y agoThis seems like a non sequitor to me? Why would not blaming people for falling for scams* require that you make laws stopping people from scamming? *Using scams here as catchall for various kinds of deceit.