4 ms·

Ask HN: the road to learning useful math

59 points by Torn 17y ago

Background: I've got a fairly good intuition for logic and algorithms as a coder, but no formal training in the maths side of things. I last did math in high-school (A-level here in the UK at 18) and while I remember some calculus, pure maths, probability etc., I've never really touched advanced stuff. I didn't take any maths modules at University either. I've recently come across quite a few interesting stats-heavy compsci papers where the mathematical notations and concepts expressed escape me. I'd like to correct this -- and I've seen a few comments floating around here that this stuff isn't actually that hard, and this has got me thinking. Could HN recommend any 'math for programmers' resources or suggest structured approaches (ie. 'look into X, then Y, then try understanding Z) to go about learning this sort of stuff? I think I'm probably not alone here in wanting to learn more about this sort of thing. A quick google provides some interesting links to get started: Math for programmers: http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2006/03/math-for-programmers.html 'Concrete Mathematics' by Graham, Knuth & Patashnik: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concrete_Mathematics

k0n2ad 17y ago
Look at any good book about, or take a class in discrete math, probability and linear algebra. Those are the subjects that stand out for me. Discrete math is the most fundamental for computer science. That Concrete Mathematics book looks promising - plus it's got some information about algorithm analysis and other computer science specific topics. You should take a class in discrete math, or if you're disciplined enough, start with that book.
mistertim 17y ago
I'm in a similar situation - My last academic exposure to maths was at GCSE level (age 16 for non-UK people), and I've recently attempted to rectify that. I've just begun a degree in mathematics through http://www.open.ac.uk http://www.open.ac.uk - The first module has been useful for me but maybe less so if you've done an A-level, but it looks like it progresses onto some useful stuff. I can also highly recommend 'Concrete Mathematics' - It's been really useful for filling in some context around the (first module) OU course - typically we're taught practical applications of mathematics that skip over the proofs and derivations - and CM is great at filling in some of the rigour that the OU misses out. Also, you might want to check out the wikibooks High School Mathematics Extensions textbook: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/High_School_Mathematics_Extensions http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/High_School_Mathematics_Extensi... - there's a whole lot of rigarous but accessible introductions to some pertinent mathematical concepts. Marcus du Sautoy's 'The Music of the Primes' is also great as a bit of light reading to give you a sense of the history (and some very basic mathematical concepts) of the subject. Cheers, Tim
prabodh 17y ago
Numerical Recipes is must read
- gjm11 17y ago
  ... but not really the sort of mathematics it sounds like the OP is interested in learning right now. (I agree that NR is a first-rate bit of paedagogy. It's usual for numerics experts to be sniffy about the actual algorithms, which are often chosen for simplicity or clarity more than for their actual performance.)
  - prabodh 17y ago
    Could HN recommend any 'math for programmers' resources or suggest structured approaches... I suggested Numerical recipes coz it contains the implementation of Various Liner Algebra algorithms which form the basics of Math for Programmers..
    - vijayr 17y ago
      any recommendations to learn Fractal geometry, from the ground up?
benm 17y ago
Gilbert Strang's Linear algebra book was great for me after taking A-level as a mature student, linear algebra comes in everywhere (I think there are videos of Strang floating around as well). Make sure to work through as many exercises as you can if you're studying independently. An approach that might work for some is to take a good undergrad textbook of something you're interested in, but that is a bit too hard (preferably not too dense, with enough explanatory text). Try to plough through it, and look up all the stuff you don't understand! Don't expect to get very far very quickly, but at least you'll get led to useful reading material for the fields you care about, and it might also motivate you more than starting from axioms. (For me it was Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms that sparked off a lot of study: free online at http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/mackay/itila/ http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/mackay/itila/ ).
bhrgunatha 17y ago
MIT's OpenCourseWare site provides a lot of course material - http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/courses/courses/index.htm http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/courses/courses/index.htm Mathematics for Computer Science is perhaps tailor made for your needs - http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Electrical-Engineering-and-Computer-Science/6-042JMathematics-for-Computer-ScienceFall2002/CourseHome/index.htm http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Electrical-Engineering-and-Compute...
Tichy 17y ago
Not sure if reading a maths book will really be easier than reading those papers. In both cases, you kind of have to grind through it. Wikipedia often helps with the notations. I think learning useful maths is best done by reading up on the stuff you presently need. I have several maths books that I never read because while it seemed like a nice idea, in the end there just wasn't enough motivation for it.
euroclydon 17y ago
It can be difficult to stay awake when trying to learn Math or especially Stats in the abstract. Are you reading these stats-heavy comp-sci papers for a particular reason beyond mere curiosity, like for a project or for work? If so, then you will have what I consider the most crucial element needed for learning a difficult subject: motivation, real lasting motivation. My advice: identify a concrete need to learn about a particular area of math/stats, like solving a real-world problem with software, then don't start by getting bogged down in a particular equation, but instead, find out the area of math/stats which that equation is a part of, and seek out the most interesting essay or video lecture about it. It's important that this video or essay be composed by someone with a reputation for making the complicated accessible to mere mortals. Good luck!
- Torn 17y ago
  Completely agree, and motivation is definitely a factor in how I've directed my own learning previously. Fortunately, my growing interest in this sort of stuff is related to my day job as a coder, and I would definitely be looking to jump in as early as possible with code to play around with new ideas learnt.
silentbicycle 17y ago
I've found Project Euler (http://projecteuler.net/ http://projecteuler.net/) tremendously helpful for this sort of thing - some of the puzzles I couldn't figure out the mathematical trick to do it efficiently, but after I solved it I read through the forum posts and made sure I could rewrite the full solution in the languages I'm using. (The same works well for learning algorithms or feeling out a language, if you're solid on the mathematical side.) _Mathematics: From the Birth of Numbers_ by Gullberg and Hilton (http://www.librarything.com/work/23014 http://www.librarything.com/work/23014) is also a good overview. It starts with counting (Roman numerals, numbers in ancient Egyptian writing, etc.) and builds up from there. The writing seems quite clear, and it covers both the mathematical concepts and their history. (I like this approach quite a bit, though my background is in history. YMMV.) I haven't gotten to the chapters for math I'm completely new to yet, but it seems like it would introduce you to enough basic concepts that you could have a clearer idea where to go next. _The Cartoon Guide to Statistics_ by Larry Gonick (http://www.librarything.com/work/12735 http://www.librarything.com/work/12735) seems like a good statistics refresher / overview. It's not that deep, and it's rather hokey, but it's a quick read. An important part of reading math papers is not getting thrown by the dense notation, so starting with something less formal may be helpful.
ionfish 17y ago
A while ago, I collected some references and recommendations for books and online material covering discrete mathematics. They were mainly sourced from previous discussions on Hacker News. The file's up on GitHub. http://github.com/ionfish/notes/blob/master/discrete-maths.md http://github.com/ionfish/notes/blob/master/discrete-maths.m... The formatting is a little unreadable—I need to fix the Markdown line breaks—but it does have a fair few links.
ananthrk 17y ago
Some suggestions (from HN over various threads) Practical Foundations of Mathematics http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~pt/Practical_Foundations/index.html http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~pt/Practical_Foundations/index.html Linear Algebra - Gilbert Strang (Book & Videos) Linear Algebra and Applications http://www.math.unl.edu/~tshores1/linalgtext.html http://www.math.unl.edu/~tshores1/linalgtext.html P.S. There was another Introduction to Statistics book that I am not able to find the link for.
caffeine 17y ago
Could you be more specific about what kind of math you've been seeing in the papers that you'd like to understand (and/or link some of the papers)? What you need to know is on this list http://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk/teaching/courses/ml1-2009/cribsheet.pdf http://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk/teaching/courses/ml1-2009/cribsh... for the most part. Because math is layered, once you've got three or four layers of unfamiliar abstraction, it gets very hard to figure out what's going on. The way to get around this initially is by brute force. For example, say you have a matrix function (from matrices to matrices). The formula uses the exponential of a matrix, and you're not sure what that actually looks like. So find the definition, and write it out. Think about what that means, maybe do a couple of examples to get a sense of it. Write out your matrix function with this definition expanded (which probably means you'll write it element-wise), so that you know what each element of the output matrix is as a function of the elements of the input matrix. Work a couple of examples, think about it. Eventually, you get familiar with the exponential of a matrix, and you do the mapping in your head - so your brain has just acquired a new abstraction. The process above applies to basically every mathematical structure you'll run into. Sometimes you'll have to recurse a few levels. It's not about books, it's about process. You can know how to do lots of math problems and still not grok papers - and you can learn to quickly grok papers and be able to implement them / reason about them without being very good at math problems (I'm in the 2nd bunch). In terms of books, you only really need Wikipedia / Wolfram MathWorld, plus maybe one of the standard math references like Kreyszig or Boas. Learning to use Mathematica can make your life much easier as well. One last comment: A book that totally changed my relationship to math is Peter Szekeres' Modern Mathematical Physics: Groups, Hilbert Space, and Differential Geometry. The explanations are uncompromisingly lucid, written in plain english, with minimal symbol walls. The book takes you essentially from zero, and introduces nearly all the math that underpins modern physics. This book really changed my conception of myself - I've lost my fear, when reading papers, that maybe this is the one I'm not smart enough to understand. When that fear goes, the stress goes - and you know it's just a matter of learning the definitions. Then it becomes pleasurable, like a puzzle.
- Torn 17y ago
  One of the ones that prompted me to post this topic was over here, on the topic of CRF statistical models: http://www.cs.umass.edu/~mccallum/papers/ifcrf-uai2003.pdf http://www.cs.umass.edu/~mccallum/papers/ifcrf-uai2003.pdf From reading it I get most of what it's about, and how they work, but the embedded probability stuff is mostly squiggles to me. I guess my ultimate aim with this is would be able to quickly grok papers on various compsci subjects, and then go around and code implementations to test things out.
zackattack 17y ago
This thread comes up at least once a month. We really need an HN FAQ or Wiki.
hyperbovine 17y ago
Go back to school. I'm not sure how this works in UK, but here in the US your local state school usually offers part time masters degrees for people who are working. I started my masters in math a year ago and the change has been profound. It's like night and day, what I knew about math a year ago vs what I know now. If you are serious about learning math the right way there is no better option.
- Torn 17y ago
  This is an option, however would have to get quite serious about learning this stuff (balance gain / reward against things like tuition fees, learning in my own time outside of long work hours, etc).
  - weaksauce 17y ago
    I don't know about you but a lot of people need the external motivation of school deadlines and the bad marks on a permanent record to actually do the material.
    - hyperbovine 17y ago
      Exactly. I told myself for years that I was better off doing the material on my own. The autodidactic tradition is strong among computer programmers, and I suspect that many reading this would feel the same way. But the truth is, I have learned 10x more in one year of school than I did in five years of muddling through textbooks on my own. Fear of failure is a strong motivator, as is immersing yourself in a community of like-minded people.
      - jriddycuz 17y ago
        I guess it really just depends on what motivates you. Grades never motivated me, and I never felt like my academic peers and I were "like-minded", so school ended up feeling more like an impediment to my education than an enlightening experience. There are certainly problems with learning on your own, not the least of which is maintaining the drive to push through the icky parts. But in the absence of external motivational structures, you can give your self-discipline a workout. I'm not a particularly disciplined person, but I can still commit to doing 1 hour of math a day. I guess I think of it like my daily mental exercise. It's hard to develop this habit though, and if you can't, school's not a bad option. One of the other problems with learning math on your own is not having anyone to ask questions. To help with this, I've actively tried to make friends (of sorts) with math professors at a nearby school. I get lunch with one every once in a while, and we talk about sports and life and math. This can kinda substitute for the community of like-minded people that school provides. All this goes to say is that you have to be aware of how you learn and how you get motivated. If you are externally driven, and don't mind learning at a pace you did not establish, school will be useful to you. If you don't grok extrinsic motivation, school's rough and you should learn on your own.
johnmyleswhite 17y ago
It sounds like you're interested in statistics from the words "a few interesting stats-heavy compsci papers". The MacKay book, "Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms," already referenced by benm is quite good, but I'd suggest on top of it Larry Wasserman's amazing book, "All of Statistics". If the level of calculus and linear calculus in that book is too much for you, you might need to review that material first before moving on to anything sophisticated in statistics. In the interim, you could start with David Freedman's "Statistics" (written along with Pisani and Purves) to at least get a feel for the basic ideas of statistics from one of the great statistical writers of the 20th century. If there are other things you want to learn about, I'd be happy to make suggestions, as I went in the opposite direction as you're trying to go now, having been a math major as an undergrad who picked up CS along the way. For cryptography, for instance, you'd need to learn number theory and then abstract algebra, but those things will be of little use to you in other contexts.
tokenadult 17y ago
Statistics is a very interesting subject, and it is a distinct subject from mathematics proper. Here (in what is becoming a FAQ post for HN) are two favorite recommendations for free Web-based resources on what statistics is as a discipline, both of which recommend good textbooks for follow-up study: "Advice to Mathematics Teachers on Evaluating Introductory Statistics Textbooks" by Robert W. Hayden http://statland.org/MyPapers/MAAFIXED.PDF http://statland.org/MyPapers/MAAFIXED.PDF "The Introductory Statistics Course: A Ptolemaic Curriculum?" by George W. Cobb http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=uclastat/cts/tise http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=10... Both are excellent introductions to what statistics is as a discipline and how it is related to, but distinct from, mathematics. A very good list of statistics textbooks appears here: http://web.mac.com/mrmathman/MrMathMan/New_Teacher_Resources.html http://web.mac.com/mrmathman/MrMathMan/New_Teacher_Resources...
RiderOfGiraffes 17y ago
We might be able to help each other. I'm working on a project to help people like you, so you can help me design that, and I can help you with your specific concerns. Check my profile.
Ixiaus 17y ago
In the course of my self-education I've come across a number of interesting books for mathematics. My two favorites: - Practical Mathematics by C. I. Palmer - Mathematics for the Nonmathematician by Morris Kline Practical Mathematics is an old book, first published in the early nineteen hundreds. It covers everything beginning with multiplication to advanced algebra and trig. It uses practical trade problems in gear cutting, cam ratios in engines, &c... The book has only been re-published by the company Lindsay's Technical Books. You can also find it in Google's book repository. Mathematics for the Nonmathematician is a bit more recent and written by a strong mathematician with a lot of history and background. This book got me hooked on mathematics, no other book has done that; his in-depth scholarly work plus his skill in mathematics makes it both interesting and educating to read. A large majority of programming problems can be tackled with solid arithmetic or algebra.

59 points by Torn 17y ago

k0n2ad 17y ago

Look at any good book about, or take a class in discrete math, probability and linear algebra. Those are the subjects that stand out for me. Discrete math is the most fundamental for computer science. That Concrete Mathematics book looks promising - plus it's got some information about algorithm analysis and other computer science specific topics. You should take a class in discrete math, or if you're disciplined enough, start with that book.

mistertim 17y ago

I'm in a similar situation - My last academic exposure to maths was at GCSE level (age 16 for non-UK people), and I've recently attempted to rectify that. I've just begun a degree in mathematics through http://www.open.ac.uk http://www.open.ac.uk - The first module has been useful for me but maybe less so if you've done an A-level, but it looks like it progresses onto some useful stuff. I can also highly recommend 'Concrete Mathematics' - It's been really useful for filling in some context around the (first module) OU course - typically we're taught practical applications of mathematics that skip over the proofs and derivations - and CM is great at filling in some of the rigour that the OU misses out. Also, you might want to check out the wikibooks High School Mathematics Extensions textbook: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/High_School_Mathematics_Extensions http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/High_School_Mathematics_Extensi... - there's a whole lot of rigarous but accessible introductions to some pertinent mathematical concepts. Marcus du Sautoy's 'The Music of the Primes' is also great as a bit of light reading to give you a sense of the history (and some very basic mathematical concepts) of the subject. Cheers, Tim

prabodh 17y ago

Numerical Recipes is must read

gjm11 17y ago
... but not really the sort of mathematics it sounds like the OP is interested in learning right now. (I agree that NR is a first-rate bit of paedagogy. It's usual for numerics experts to be sniffy about the actual algorithms, which are often chosen for simplicity or clarity more than for their actual performance.)
- prabodh 17y ago
  Could HN recommend any 'math for programmers' resources or suggest structured approaches... I suggested Numerical recipes coz it contains the implementation of Various Liner Algebra algorithms which form the basics of Math for Programmers..
  - vijayr 17y ago
    any recommendations to learn Fractal geometry, from the ground up?

benm 17y ago

Gilbert Strang's Linear algebra book was great for me after taking A-level as a mature student, linear algebra comes in everywhere (I think there are videos of Strang floating around as well). Make sure to work through as many exercises as you can if you're studying independently. An approach that might work for some is to take a good undergrad textbook of something you're interested in, but that is a bit too hard (preferably not too dense, with enough explanatory text). Try to plough through it, and look up all the stuff you don't understand! Don't expect to get very far very quickly, but at least you'll get led to useful reading material for the fields you care about, and it might also motivate you more than starting from axioms. (For me it was Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms that sparked off a lot of study: free online at http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/mackay/itila/ http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/mackay/itila/ ).

bhrgunatha 17y ago

MIT's OpenCourseWare site provides a lot of course material - http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/courses/courses/index.htm http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/web/courses/courses/index.htm Mathematics for Computer Science is perhaps tailor made for your needs - http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Electrical-Engineering-and-Computer-Science/6-042JMathematics-for-Computer-ScienceFall2002/CourseHome/index.htm http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Electrical-Engineering-and-Compute...

Tichy 17y ago

Not sure if reading a maths book will really be easier than reading those papers. In both cases, you kind of have to grind through it. Wikipedia often helps with the notations. I think learning useful maths is best done by reading up on the stuff you presently need. I have several maths books that I never read because while it seemed like a nice idea, in the end there just wasn't enough motivation for it.

euroclydon 17y ago

It can be difficult to stay awake when trying to learn Math or especially Stats in the abstract. Are you reading these stats-heavy comp-sci papers for a particular reason beyond mere curiosity, like for a project or for work? If so, then you will have what I consider the most crucial element needed for learning a difficult subject: motivation, real lasting motivation. My advice: identify a concrete need to learn about a particular area of math/stats, like solving a real-world problem with software, then don't start by getting bogged down in a particular equation, but instead, find out the area of math/stats which that equation is a part of, and seek out the most interesting essay or video lecture about it. It's important that this video or essay be composed by someone with a reputation for making the complicated accessible to mere mortals. Good luck!

Torn 17y ago
Completely agree, and motivation is definitely a factor in how I've directed my own learning previously. Fortunately, my growing interest in this sort of stuff is related to my day job as a coder, and I would definitely be looking to jump in as early as possible with code to play around with new ideas learnt.

silentbicycle 17y ago

I've found Project Euler (http://projecteuler.net/ http://projecteuler.net/) tremendously helpful for this sort of thing - some of the puzzles I couldn't figure out the mathematical trick to do it efficiently, but after I solved it I read through the forum posts and made sure I could rewrite the full solution in the languages I'm using. (The same works well for learning algorithms or feeling out a language, if you're solid on the mathematical side.) _Mathematics: From the Birth of Numbers_ by Gullberg and Hilton (http://www.librarything.com/work/23014 http://www.librarything.com/work/23014) is also a good overview. It starts with counting (Roman numerals, numbers in ancient Egyptian writing, etc.) and builds up from there. The writing seems quite clear, and it covers both the mathematical concepts and their history. (I like this approach quite a bit, though my background is in history. YMMV.) I haven't gotten to the chapters for math I'm completely new to yet, but it seems like it would introduce you to enough basic concepts that you could have a clearer idea where to go next. _The Cartoon Guide to Statistics_ by Larry Gonick (http://www.librarything.com/work/12735 http://www.librarything.com/work/12735) seems like a good statistics refresher / overview. It's not that deep, and it's rather hokey, but it's a quick read. An important part of reading math papers is not getting thrown by the dense notation, so starting with something less formal may be helpful.

ionfish 17y ago

A while ago, I collected some references and recommendations for books and online material covering discrete mathematics. They were mainly sourced from previous discussions on Hacker News. The file's up on GitHub. http://github.com/ionfish/notes/blob/master/discrete-maths.md http://github.com/ionfish/notes/blob/master/discrete-maths.m... The formatting is a little unreadable—I need to fix the Markdown line breaks—but it does have a fair few links.

ananthrk 17y ago

Some suggestions (from HN over various threads) Practical Foundations of Mathematics http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~pt/Practical_Foundations/index.html http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~pt/Practical_Foundations/index.html Linear Algebra - Gilbert Strang (Book & Videos) Linear Algebra and Applications http://www.math.unl.edu/~tshores1/linalgtext.html http://www.math.unl.edu/~tshores1/linalgtext.html P.S. There was another Introduction to Statistics book that I am not able to find the link for.

caffeine 17y ago

Could you be more specific about what kind of math you've been seeing in the papers that you'd like to understand (and/or link some of the papers)? What you need to know is on this list http://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk/teaching/courses/ml1-2009/cribsheet.pdf http://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk/teaching/courses/ml1-2009/cribsh... for the most part. Because math is layered, once you've got three or four layers of unfamiliar abstraction, it gets very hard to figure out what's going on. The way to get around this initially is by brute force. For example, say you have a matrix function (from matrices to matrices). The formula uses the exponential of a matrix, and you're not sure what that actually looks like. So find the definition, and write it out. Think about what that means, maybe do a couple of examples to get a sense of it. Write out your matrix function with this definition expanded (which probably means you'll write it element-wise), so that you know what each element of the output matrix is as a function of the elements of the input matrix. Work a couple of examples, think about it. Eventually, you get familiar with the exponential of a matrix, and you do the mapping in your head - so your brain has just acquired a new abstraction. The process above applies to basically every mathematical structure you'll run into. Sometimes you'll have to recurse a few levels. It's not about books, it's about process. You can know how to do lots of math problems and still not grok papers - and you can learn to quickly grok papers and be able to implement them / reason about them without being very good at math problems (I'm in the 2nd bunch). In terms of books, you only really need Wikipedia / Wolfram MathWorld, plus maybe one of the standard math references like Kreyszig or Boas. Learning to use Mathematica can make your life much easier as well. One last comment: A book that totally changed my relationship to math is Peter Szekeres' Modern Mathematical Physics: Groups, Hilbert Space, and Differential Geometry. The explanations are uncompromisingly lucid, written in plain english, with minimal symbol walls. The book takes you essentially from zero, and introduces nearly all the math that underpins modern physics. This book really changed my conception of myself - I've lost my fear, when reading papers, that maybe this is the one I'm not smart enough to understand. When that fear goes, the stress goes - and you know it's just a matter of learning the definitions. Then it becomes pleasurable, like a puzzle.

Torn 17y ago
One of the ones that prompted me to post this topic was over here, on the topic of CRF statistical models: http://www.cs.umass.edu/~mccallum/papers/ifcrf-uai2003.pdf http://www.cs.umass.edu/~mccallum/papers/ifcrf-uai2003.pdf From reading it I get most of what it's about, and how they work, but the embedded probability stuff is mostly squiggles to me. I guess my ultimate aim with this is would be able to quickly grok papers on various compsci subjects, and then go around and code implementations to test things out.

zackattack 17y ago

This thread comes up at least once a month. We really need an HN FAQ or Wiki.

hyperbovine 17y ago

Go back to school. I'm not sure how this works in UK, but here in the US your local state school usually offers part time masters degrees for people who are working. I started my masters in math a year ago and the change has been profound. It's like night and day, what I knew about math a year ago vs what I know now. If you are serious about learning math the right way there is no better option.

Torn 17y ago
This is an option, however would have to get quite serious about learning this stuff (balance gain / reward against things like tuition fees, learning in my own time outside of long work hours, etc).
- weaksauce 17y ago
  I don't know about you but a lot of people need the external motivation of school deadlines and the bad marks on a permanent record to actually do the material.
  - hyperbovine 17y ago
    Exactly. I told myself for years that I was better off doing the material on my own. The autodidactic tradition is strong among computer programmers, and I suspect that many reading this would feel the same way. But the truth is, I have learned 10x more in one year of school than I did in five years of muddling through textbooks on my own. Fear of failure is a strong motivator, as is immersing yourself in a community of like-minded people.
    - jriddycuz 17y ago
      I guess it really just depends on what motivates you. Grades never motivated me, and I never felt like my academic peers and I were "like-minded", so school ended up feeling more like an impediment to my education than an enlightening experience. There are certainly problems with learning on your own, not the least of which is maintaining the drive to push through the icky parts. But in the absence of external motivational structures, you can give your self-discipline a workout. I'm not a particularly disciplined person, but I can still commit to doing 1 hour of math a day. I guess I think of it like my daily mental exercise. It's hard to develop this habit though, and if you can't, school's not a bad option. One of the other problems with learning math on your own is not having anyone to ask questions. To help with this, I've actively tried to make friends (of sorts) with math professors at a nearby school. I get lunch with one every once in a while, and we talk about sports and life and math. This can kinda substitute for the community of like-minded people that school provides. All this goes to say is that you have to be aware of how you learn and how you get motivated. If you are externally driven, and don't mind learning at a pace you did not establish, school will be useful to you. If you don't grok extrinsic motivation, school's rough and you should learn on your own.

johnmyleswhite 17y ago

It sounds like you're interested in statistics from the words "a few interesting stats-heavy compsci papers". The MacKay book, "Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms," already referenced by benm is quite good, but I'd suggest on top of it Larry Wasserman's amazing book, "All of Statistics". If the level of calculus and linear calculus in that book is too much for you, you might need to review that material first before moving on to anything sophisticated in statistics. In the interim, you could start with David Freedman's "Statistics" (written along with Pisani and Purves) to at least get a feel for the basic ideas of statistics from one of the great statistical writers of the 20th century. If there are other things you want to learn about, I'd be happy to make suggestions, as I went in the opposite direction as you're trying to go now, having been a math major as an undergrad who picked up CS along the way. For cryptography, for instance, you'd need to learn number theory and then abstract algebra, but those things will be of little use to you in other contexts.

tokenadult 17y ago

Statistics is a very interesting subject, and it is a distinct subject from mathematics proper. Here (in what is becoming a FAQ post for HN) are two favorite recommendations for free Web-based resources on what statistics is as a discipline, both of which recommend good textbooks for follow-up study: "Advice to Mathematics Teachers on Evaluating Introductory Statistics Textbooks" by Robert W. Hayden http://statland.org/MyPapers/MAAFIXED.PDF http://statland.org/MyPapers/MAAFIXED.PDF "The Introductory Statistics Course: A Ptolemaic Curriculum?" by George W. Cobb http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=uclastat/cts/tise http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=10... Both are excellent introductions to what statistics is as a discipline and how it is related to, but distinct from, mathematics. A very good list of statistics textbooks appears here: http://web.mac.com/mrmathman/MrMathMan/New_Teacher_Resources.html http://web.mac.com/mrmathman/MrMathMan/New_Teacher_Resources...

RiderOfGiraffes 17y ago

We might be able to help each other. I'm working on a project to help people like you, so you can help me design that, and I can help you with your specific concerns. Check my profile.

Ixiaus 17y ago

In the course of my self-education I've come across a number of interesting books for mathematics. My two favorites: - Practical Mathematics by C. I. Palmer - Mathematics for the Nonmathematician by Morris Kline Practical Mathematics is an old book, first published in the early nineteen hundreds. It covers everything beginning with multiplication to advanced algebra and trig. It uses practical trade problems in gear cutting, cam ratios in engines, &c... The book has only been re-published by the company Lindsay's Technical Books. You can also find it in Google's book repository. Mathematics for the Nonmathematician is a bit more recent and written by a strong mathematician with a lot of history and background. This book got me hooked on mathematics, no other book has done that; his in-depth scholarly work plus his skill in mathematics makes it both interesting and educating to read. A large majority of programming problems can be tackled with solid arithmetic or algebra.