4 ms·
I just realised that imgur does not support webm. I thought it does. Thats kind of stupid. For other websites it'd be as simple as adding a mime type to the lis
by 1ris 12y ago
I just realised that imgur does not support webm. I thought it does. Thats kind of stupid. For other websites it'd be as simple as adding a mime type to the list of accepted uploads. Unfortunalty you are right, right now webm is still exotic.
- voltagex_ 12y agoThe silly thing is if you have a gif and change the URL on imgur to read ".gifv" you'll get WebM!
- Springtime 12y agoI've seen WebMs on Imgur. When saved and opened to check the encoding some are VPx, while others are h.264 encoded in a WebM container. I can probably find some links later. As I see no option to upload video directly I'm wondering if it requires an account, or whether it was their new(ish) GIF conversion process (IIRC some look like original videos though).
- 1ris 12y agoYou can't upload webms tough.
- acdha 12y agoWebM is dying – since Microsoft and Apple aren't implementing it, you're basically asking whether it's worth doubling your file storage to support a format available in maybe 60% of browsers versus one supported by 90%: http://caniuse.com/#feat=webm http://caniuse.com/#feat=webm http://caniuse.com/#feat=mpeg4 http://caniuse.com/#feat=mpeg4 That's even more compelling when you remember that the only browser which had releases with support for WebM but not H.264 is Firefox and that's been phasing out for awhile: support for H.264 shipped in FF21 on Windows, FF26 on Linux and FF35 on OS X. Unless you have a lot of Mac users who don't upgrade, it's probably not worth the hassle particularly since WebM doesn't compress as well as H.264. If VP9 ships that story could change if it delivers an advantage over H.265 compelling enough to get Microsoft or Apple to integrate it or the larger video sides to add it to their toolchain. For most places it'd have to be really compelling to be worth nearly doubling their storage costs.