3 ms·

So I guess this is slower than JavaScriptCore and you have to get commercial license to actually embed it. Why would one choose it at all?

• chc 12y ago
  From the linked site: "Why? Because V8, SpiderMonkey and JavaScriptCore are all too big and complex. MuJS's focus is on small size, correctness and simplicity."
  • xavel 12y ago
    About 'correctness' and 'small size' ... as soon as they'd add unittests as extensive as V8, JSCore, or SpiderMonkey, it'd grow big quite dramatically. :-) I'd be interested to see how ES5-compliant MuJS really is. My guess is probably different from what they claim.
    • anentropic 12y ago
      surely unit tests don't get compiled in?
• chj 12y ago
  And JavaScriptCore actually has very solid API, if not simpler.