3 ms·
The apartment argument is faulty. You're leasing the apartment for a long-term stay in addition to having laws requiring privacy in your own home. A landlord, f
by samtho 12y ago
The apartment argument is faulty. You're leasing the apartment for a long-term stay in addition to having laws requiring privacy in your own home. A landlord, for example, does not have the right to enter an occupied home without permission.
A vehicle, by contrast, is equipment that is being rented. There is a greater chance of getting into a wreck with a vehicle than an apartment with the burden of insurance on the car rental company. A communication device such as this could be used for mal-intent, but does any company want a rep for spying on people? More than likely this is being used for safety and insurance in addition to a direct line to Hertz if you get into an accident or require roadside assistance. This is basically going to be OnStar taken to the 2010's of technology.
- Cheapshot 12y agoYour argument is faulty. You rent a hotel room for a short term stay just like the car. You have an expectation of privacy in a hotel room just like in a car. If you disagree then you should be the last to complain when a private moment at a hotel room of you is leaked on the internet.
- Raphmedia 12y agoBut you don't carry the hotel room with you. A car is a piece of equipment. You use that piece of equipment in public. I don't see why there should be an expectation of privacy. Most security features are used once the car is flagged stolen. Nobody is going to listen to you sing karaoke in the car.