> The unfortunate thing is that not everyone is lucky enough to have a match between their interests and their job. Someone might be a once-in-a-generation pupp

> The unfortunate thing is that not everyone is lucky enough to have a match between their interests and their job. Someone might be a once-in-a-generation puppeteer, but they have to get a day job as a bank teller. Here's the thing, though. I have a lot of interests. I find my job interesting, but I also find out jazz and improvised music interesting, and I go to a lot of concerts. I find somewhat elaborate cooking projects interesting, and I set aside time for them. I find certain kinds of literature interesting and have tons of books I want to read and some I even am reading. I have writing projects (essays, not code-writing). I go out with my girlfriend. I keep a list of movies to watch. I have a wide online acquaintance I chat with. And, yeah, I have some side-projects I like to work on or think about, but unsurprisingly they're mostly sidelined. I code when I'm at work; there's lots more to interest me the rest of the time. Does this mean I won't be the best of the best of the best? Probably in my case yes, but I'm ok with that. I'm also skeptical that it's actually necessary to be so monomaniacal to be a damn good programmer.