4 ms·
> e.g. PHP: it has a higher chance to be remotely crackable No language war/php sucks discussion, but this isn't even remotely true :/
by awalGarg 12y ago
> e.g. PHP: it has a higher chance to be remotely crackable
No language war/php sucks discussion, but this isn't even remotely true :/
- scintill76 12y agoOr at least, we can see that Ruby can have stupid security holes too, for example[0]. [0] http://sakurity.com/blog/2015/03/15/authy_bypass.html http://sakurity.com/blog/2015/03/15/authy_bypass.html ("How "../sms" could bypass Authy 2 Factor Authentication".)
- nine_k 12y agoPHP itself might be fine, but it is very widely used, and thus very thoroughly attacked. Unfortunately, a lot of sloppy code still historically exists in PHP. PHP itself is not inherently unsafe, of course. By the same token, if I deploy a network-facing app that invokes a lot of C code (as opposed to e.g. bytecode), I must be aware of a higher probability of stack smashing, buffer overruns, etc, and plan a deployment accordingly.