28 ms·

Your comment seems to encapsulate the thinking process found to be effective in the experiment. E.g. You say: very tentatively ... there is probably another ga

• zby 12y ago
  Well - there was another game described in that book (but not in that linked article) where it was better to act quickly upon any tentative hypothesis instead of gathering data first and doing much testing.
• triplesec 12y ago
  On the other hand, the thinking process found to be effective appears to be more recursive, and the failure thinking modes seemed to be less so: less data driven, less flexible in their handling of feedback, and so on. I might suggest that this article/research sets out a meta-thinking process, a second-order thinking process if you like (akin to second-order moral principles: another level of abstraction), compared with many other more narrow, less flexible, less recursive and more simply rule-driven than this.