3 ms·
but a guarantor is no different than a co-signer in America which lots of young people need Respectfully, they are quite different. A co-signer is generally u
by patio11 12y ago
but a guarantor is no different than a co-signer in America which lots of young people need
Respectfully, they are quite different. A co-signer is generally used only if the first party can't pay rent. A guarantor is used regardless of ability to pay and is explicitly designed to make sure that only people with appropriate social status are allowed to live in the building.
Not sure what a guarantor fee
If you're unable to come up with a Japanese company to guarantee you because of social ties, you can pay a company to do so. (This is, ahem, often necessary but insufficient to pass the must-be-at-least-this-social-status-to-rent bar.)
It's basically a surety bond: they promise my landlord one month's rent if I skip out. This bond costs me precisely one month's rent and is nonrefundable, much like an insurance premium. (Warren Buffet just said "Eff me that's the most profitable insurance policy in history.")
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- JohnLen 12y agoThis is, ahem, often necessary but insufficient to pass the must-be-at-least-this-social-status-to-rent bar. So sometimes even paying someone isn't enough?
- nandemo 12y agoRight. Some landlords/management companies don't accept guarantor companies.
- GFischer 12y agoI work for an insurance company that sells that kind of surety, and it IS the most profitable product :)
- greggman 12y agoI wouldn't call them quite different. Both are a 2nd party guaranteeing the rent and damage compensation. The other differences are minor.