> If Scrum is so mega simple, why do we see endless cases of it failing to being implemented correctly? Just because something's simple doesn't mean it's got b

> If Scrum is so mega simple, why do we see endless cases of it failing to being implemented correctly? Just because something's simple doesn't mean it's got buy-in. It fails because implementers fail to get buy-in from people with power, and those people insist on keeping their pet processes in place.