3 ms·
It also conveniently omitted any calculation about how the owner is 'losing money', despite there being a ~$14,000 positive difference between what the tenant i
by jsprogrammer 12y ago
It also conveniently omitted any calculation about how the owner is 'losing money', despite there being a ~$14,000 positive difference between what the tenant is paying per year and the taxes due.
- blake_himself 12y agoLosing, compared to what he could have been making.
- WalterSear 12y agoNelson: Hey, look how much Skinner makes. 25,000 dollars a year! Bart: Lets see, he's 40 years old, times 25 grand.. woah! He's a millionaire!
- jsprogrammer 12y agoDo you imply that someone should be able to be a millionaire, or even 'rich', solely by collecting rent on real property? Real property that is apparently not even properly maintained? Talk about market inefficiencies.
- pgwhalen 12y agoIt's a bit foolish to assume that a landlord's sole expense is property tax.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]