5 ms·
It's interesting that AT&T isn't disputing the lack of 3G coverage claim. Instead, they're stretching to say Verizon was implying something else with clearly-la
by rriepe 17y ago
It's interesting that AT&T isn't disputing the lack of 3G coverage claim. Instead, they're stretching to say Verizon was implying something else with clearly-labeled maps.
Pretty inane. I doubt they'll win. It reflects pretty badly on them, too.
- jamesbressi 17y agoAgreed. Total waste of AT&T's money to pursue this. Embarrassing on their part, if you ask me. WAIT! Here's an idea: The money they are spending on legal for this lawsuit they could use to improve the network! Ha, I know, that's just craaaaazy talk. Silly me.
- 100k 17y agoAnyone who has driven across the US with an iPhone (or, hell, tried to use on in San Francisco) knows AT&T's 3G network is total crap. I don't think they win by fighting this characterization.