3 ms·
Why? This really feels like cramming a square peg into a round hole. Anytime anyone wants something more complex than simply lightly formatted text they will ha
by JetSpiegel 12y ago
Why? This really feels like cramming a square peg into a round hole. Anytime anyone wants something more complex than simply lightly formatted text they will have to use other tool (LaTeX), so why not just use LaTeX in the first place?
- droque 12y agoThe way I see it, the main feature is being able to plug math formulas in, rather than formatting documents. It allows you to focus on your content (one feature of Markdown) while still being able to write mathematics.
- mturmon 12y ago"It allows you to focus on your content (one feature of Markdown) while still being able to write mathematics." That's what LaTeX does too. Its markup, generally, is semantic.
- sjy 12y agoIn my experience LaTeX is quite poor at separating content from presentation, at least when you're unwilling to rely on the default styles. All the layout commands are context-sensitive, so I often end up writing presentation code in the middle of my content, or accidentally breaking the layout by moving content around.
- mturmon 12y agoYou should be putting your alternate style in a .cls file and not inline. If you are super picky about format, then none of these tools are for you.
- Dewie 12y agoAlternatively you can use org-mode and extend the document with latex where appropriate.