3 ms·
Ahh, sorry, I missed that (in a display of very poor reading skills). That does make more sense. But if commercial landscaping isn't included in that 7%, this
by swimfar 12y ago
Ahh, sorry, I missed that (in a display of very poor reading skills). That does make more sense.
But if commercial landscaping isn't included in that 7%, this number becomes larger. And if the drought is very serious, why wouldn't it be theoretically possible to cut landscaping usage down to near 0%? A 25% reduction seems like it would be very easy. (Although, I admit I don't have any idea what the breakdown of landscaping water usage looks like.)
- eveningcoffee 12y agoProbably it makes much more sense to reduce water intensive agricultural activities like rice production together with other water conservation practices (i.e. making water more expensive for home users).