3 ms·
It progresses the discussion to there, by being a first principle of morality. From there, with a definition of rationality, "what is proper to the life a rati
by EarthLaunch 12y ago
It progresses the discussion to there, by being a first principle of morality. From there, with a definition of rationality, "what is proper to the life a rational being" can be answered. For example, death is not proper to the life a rational being. From that follows certain things to avoid. Using this logic, those things would be morally wrong.
- icebraining 12y agoFor example, death is not proper to the life a rational being. Why not?
- EarthLaunch 12y agoI didn't just assert that, it was based on the preceding logic. "Why not" is answered by what I proposed in my previous comment. Not up for debating it with you further. With a name like icebraining, have you ever wondered if you're the baddy? [1] [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn1VxaMEjRU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hn1VxaMEjRU