3 ms·

Seems to be much more complicated and slower than godoc.org

• sqs 12y ago
  Quinn from Sourcegraph here. Sorry for the slowness. It has to pull a lot of data to show the code highlights and cross-reference counts, and it's getting a lot of traffic. We're working on improving the perf. As for the increased complexity vs. plain godoc.org, we thought about just forking godoc.org and adding this in (instead of integrating it into Sourcegraph), but this was a quicker way to get this out there, and lots of folks seem to like it so far. Would you prefer to just see this linked/highlighted code and the usage examples in the godoc.org page design?
  • tumdum_ 12y ago
    It seems like something is broken: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptzmn3aT0qA&feature=youtu.be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptzmn3aT0qA&feature=youtu.be (FF 35.0.1)
    • sqs 12y ago
      Quinn from Sourcegraph here. Looks like a bug on Firefox that we need to fix. Thanks for reporting it. Filed @ https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph.com/issues/373 https://github.com/sourcegraph/sourcegraph.com/issues/373.