4 ms·
There is a port of Lucene to C++, CLucene[1], it's compatible with version 2.3 of Java Lucene, the project is stopped long time ago, but it's very much stable,
by vdfs 12y ago
There is a port of Lucene to C++, CLucene[1], it's compatible with version 2.3 of Java Lucene, the project is stopped long time ago, but it's very much stable, and works perfectly.
An other port which is compatible with version 3 of java Lucene is LucenePlusPlus, but it use a lot of boost's smart pointers, the port seems like t was automated. This port was why CLucene development stopped, the maintainers wanted to make this new port faster by not using smart pointers whenever possible, but that didn't happen.
1: http://sourceforge.net/projects/clucene http://sourceforge.net/projects/clucene
2: https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus https://github.com/luceneplusplus/LucenePlusPlus
- MichaelGG 12y agoOddly enough, I don't see anyone talking about benchmarks for those projects. I found one offhand comment saying it was 2-3 faster than Java for indexing, but only 10% better for search. No real benchmarks or such. I suppose that's not the only reason to want a non-JVM version but it seems like a pretty major reason and something that'd warrant headline treatment in the readme...