Come on, Google. Do you have no QA whatsoever? Seriously, Adam (at Google). You need to maintain some smart people who continue to monitor what your products

Come on, Google. Do you have no QA whatsoever? Seriously, Adam (at Google). You need to maintain some smart people who continue to monitor what your products are actually doing in production in the real world. People who can and do go beyond thinking and acting as insiders. User advocates. It's not glamourous work. But it's necessary. I can assert, through my use of a competitor's product, that I actively check that their WhoisGuard is actually in place and renewed for each of my relevant registrations. I find it difficult to imagine there's not a smart Googler, using your services for their own private endeavours, doing the same. Or are no Googler's privately using your registration services? Trust, but verify. P.S. I'll add that this is not the first time I've encountered, as an end user, a significant security concern with Google products. The previous one was fixed. And as an end-user, it was immediately obvious to me what the problem was. Though it took a bit of arguing. To be brief, in the real world, users share computers. That should not include cached access to private cloud documents. Try selling that to e.g. the government (who is a customer).