4 ms·
I get where you're coming from, though I can't help but disagree with it. Why does it necessarily need to be hard for people to immigrate to ensure that they a
by Vraxx 12y ago
I get where you're coming from, though I can't help but disagree with it. Why does it necessarily need to be hard for people to immigrate to ensure that they are people that you want in your country? Couldn't quality be enforced or even cared about by the people that are hiring them? I should think the act of immigrating alone presents enough challenges to 'thin out' the people who don't 'want it enough'.
I think we're more likely to end up with higher quality immigrants if we provide higher quality opportunity in our countries rather than making it a ridiculous game of hoop jumping to immigrate. In fact, "lying, twisting the rules, or hiding in container ships or swimming rivers in the dark of night" sounds like it's more likely to instill contempt for the rules of the country before they're even citizen's rather than ensure their entrepreneurial spirit.
Edited to space out paragraphs.
- beat 12y ago"Contempt for the rules" is pretty congruent with "entrepreneurial spirit". :)
- Vraxx 12y agoI disagree with that because I think they are only situationally congruent and you don't necessarily need contempt for the rules to foster an entrepreneurial spirit. If the rules are burdensome without very good justification for existing (which is definitely possible) I think the two can be congruent, but I don't support making our rules burdensome without good justification for the sole purpose of breeding contempt for the rules/ an entrepreneurial spirit.