5 ms·
Is Mozilla being forced to buy Adwords to protect their users from malware?
For a while I've been moaning about the fact that paid results on Google search for terms like "firefox" or "download firefox" lead to dodgy download sites with versions of Firefox full of malware[0].
After reading a comment mentioning the issue again today[1] I did a few searches to see if anything had changed. I was surprised to find that the ads that show up for the search term "firefox" are links to Mozilla's own site: https://i.imgur.com/F9Ct4Tf.png although sometimes the malware ads still show up as well: https://i.imgur.com/oRpU5Mq.png
It appears that Mozilla, faced with a situation where many users were unable to install Firefox safely without getting malware, have decided to outbid the malware ads themselves, to try and ensure that their users get a clean download. The real Mozilla link is always the top organic result, so I can't see what other reason they would have to start bidding on expensive Adwords keywords.
Do Mozilla folk here know if the decision to start buying Google ads was discussed publicly? Is this a new policy? How much are they having to pay for this? Have they asked Google to take down the malware ads?
I find it hard to see this as anything other than extortion by Google: "pay us or your users get infected".
[0] e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8879229 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7335401 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7971201
Screenshots: https://i.imgur.com/Ote9c2k.png https://i.imgur.com/lzKU3FO.png and an older screenshot from back when the ads were more clearly marked: https://i.imgur.com/jX5Lt9F.png
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9193250
- bobcoat 12y agogoogle adwords is too expensive tu buy by mozilla, it will never happen
- wodenokoto 12y agoI used to subscribe to planet Mozilla. I remember blog posts talking about user convertion of paid advertisement on Google and they concluded it was a good deal. Other blog posts have discussed lawsuits in Germany against Firefox impersonators. It is not a new policy. When reading planet Mozilla I rarely notice who writes what and it's been a long time since I subscribed anyway, so I can't get you source, but those are my 5 cents for what it is worth.
- mattl 12y agoMozilla's EULA also prevents commercial distribution of Firefox binaries, which seems a little unusual to me.
- dothawk 12y agoThis is not really surprising to me. Have you seen Chrome? It's being bundled with heaps of malware for profit (PPI garbage).