2 ms·
Yup. indeed, but it seems so elegant, in the same way (elegant) as one can implement undo using closures - at the expense of unaccounted resources (cpu, memory,
by malkia 12y ago
Yup. indeed, but it seems so elegant, in the same way (elegant) as one can implement undo using closures - at the expense of unaccounted resources (cpu, memory, who knows what else).
From redis's page: http://redis.io/topics/persistence http://redis.io/topics/persistence
"RDB needs to fork() often in order to persist on disk using a child process. Fork() can be time consuming if the dataset is big, and may result in Redis to stop serving clients for some millisecond or even for one second if the dataset is very big and the CPU performance not great. AOF also needs to fork() but you can tune how often you want to rewrite your logs without any trade-off on durability"