3 ms·
You made the point that I was trying to make: implementations are not secure. A programming language can follow a philosophy but implementations never quite l
by trippy_biscuits 12y ago
You made the point that I was trying to make: implementations are not secure. A programming language can follow a philosophy but implementations never quite line up with the theory. We only use implementations of the theory and experience shows that implementations all have vulnerabilities.
- Ded7xSEoPKYNsDd 12y agoI'm sorry if I misrepresented your post, but I feel you do the same to mine. I didn't say the JVM is insecure - I said the sandboxing part of the JVM is insecure and C++ doesn't have anything comparable.