2 ms·
Pinning the shift to an exact date like 1610 is silly, but I do agree with the basic premise of their argument. In fact, it's essentially why I chose to special
by benbreen 12y ago
Pinning the shift to an exact date like 1610 is silly, but I do agree with the basic premise of their argument. In fact, it's essentially why I chose to specialize in the history of the seventeenth century. Just from looking at the famous "hockey stick" graph of world population you can see that this was the period immediately preceding the shift into exponential growth - but what's fascinating is that populations actually declined in many areas in the seventeenth century, as did standards of living. Speaking of which, Eric Hobsbawm's concept of a "General Crisis of the Seventeenth Century" seems relevant here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_General_Crisis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_General_Crisis