4 ms·
In addition to the other superficial claims presented in the article and exposed here I'd like to point out that the average age of regular cars in Norway is no
by ttjervaag 17y ago
In addition to the other superficial claims presented in the article and exposed here I'd like to point out that the average age of regular cars in Norway is now 10.3 years [1], compared to 9.4 years for the US [2]. Hardly worthy of the emotional statement "they drive around in wrecks".
For bigger cars, SUVs or vans, the age difference is flipped, 6.9 years in Norway and 7.5 years in the US. There is enough difference in the car models between the two continents to explain staring googly-eyed at trucks when you get to the states, without resorting to emotionally inflated statistics.
This article is pretty shallow in my eyes. It adds nothing to any debate (I'm not sure what debate it is supposed to add to) and is full of hyperbole and superficial conclusions based on one person's observations.
[1] http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/10/12/20/bilreg_en/ http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/10/12/20/bilreg_en/
[2] http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/04/study-median-age-of-cars-in-u-s-increases-to-record-high/ http://www.autoblog.com/2009/03/04/study-median-age-of-cars-...
- Tichy 17y agoPlus I suspect New York is not representative of the whole US, but I could be mistaken. I had the same "eyes falling out" effect in Germany when I visited Leipzig, a nice city in the former east German parts. It is supposed to be poor compared to Munich (where I used to live), yet all the houses looked so new and shiny. Reason: lots of money from the government for rebuilding (economic improvement plans), and also I think a famous house building scam that let to a huge influx of money into building houses. Not all the housing is put to good use now. Just to say that not all things are what they seem at face value.