5 ms·
... for this one particular person.
by nodata 12y ago
... for this one particular person.
- davidw 12y agoWell, yeah, and since that one person is me, I'm very, very unhappy with it.
- raldi 12y agoCould you post a few example emails, with all the headers?
- davidw 12y agoMost of it's private stuff, either work, or board [at] apache.org or personal emails. I'd be happy to share with someone at Google, but I'm not going to put them in public.
- raldi 12y agoWhat about just the headers, no body?
- davidw 12y agoHere's one. This was in spam too: http://code.activestate.com/lists/tcl-core/14455/ http://code.activestate.com/lists/tcl-core/14455/ "Be careful with this message. Many people marked similar messages as spam." is what Gmail reports. I've been subscribed to tcl-core for years, too.
- nodata 12y agoBut your headline reads as if it's a general problem.
- jacquesm 12y agoIt is general enough that it affects me too. Also, if with a service the size of gmail someone has a problem you can bet that that problem affects at a minimum thousands of users.
- reboog711 12y agoIT affects me do; I manually clean out my spam filter daily now just to keep the volume 'low'. I easily get at least one false positive daily.
- blawa 12y agoCan you explain what you're talking about? Do you mean that if a program exhibits bugs only under a certain condition that its bugfree? And even assuming you know the spam's distribution, the error function needs to heavily penalize any false positives. So even one occurrence is a major event. Your comment reeks of blind faith, not appropriate for a forum like this