Is 'security' really something that requires faith or belief? It seems that "more secure" (not secure in an absolute sense) can be made tangible, and I think th

Is 'security' really something that requires faith or belief? It seems that "more secure" (not secure in an absolute sense) can be made tangible, and I think that programming languages can give you "more security", in the sense that they close off certain possibilities or make them much harder to exploit/mess up. Not that I know about security, but all you're doing right now is to fend off the claim of "more secure" by stating that java is not secure in an absolute sense - no one has claimed absolute security, only relatively more.