3 ms·
I don't think you are getting it.
by frowaway001 12y ago
I don't think you are getting it.
- scott_s 12y agoFor the record, dbaupp is on the core team for Rust. But can you explain it to me? Because his explanation makes sense to me: they can't support that syntax, including getting references, without introducing new concepts. How does what your proposing get around introducing those new concepts?
- frowaway001 12y agoFor the record, Rasmus Lerdorf is on the core team for PHP. When I said "some_integer_array.at(i)" I certainly didn't mean "rename both things". Alternatively, having one additional magic kind/trait/... to denote "addressable" would be more manageable than shoe-horning things into the language's syntax which can – at this change – not be fixed anymore.
- dbaupp 12y agoYes, I'm absolutely not getting it. You're also not explaining it.