15 ms·
> The psuedocode in question happens to be syntactically valid Ruby. So is everything else anyone types, code-like or not. He even said "Note how I deliberatel
by nknighthb 12y ago
> The psuedocode in question happens to be syntactically valid Ruby.
So is everything else anyone types, code-like or not. He even said "Note how I deliberately shuffled the order and didn't bother with escaping.".
The response was flippant, intelligence-insulting, and obviously the result of failing to read thoroughly.
And speaking of intelligence-insulting, we all know you can run raw SQL through Sequel.
You're not having a useful dialogue, you're being combative, like the person I initially replied to.
- emodendroket 12y agoAs everyone has repeatedly pointed out, once you deal with the obvious issues you quickly end up with something that looks like the gazillions of other ORMs on the market; sorry if I hurt anyone's feelings.
- djur 12y agoI said the code snippet looked like raw interpolation to me, and I asked how it could be made not vulnerable to injection. It was an honest observation and a genuine question. No flippancy was involved. You're free to think I'm an idiot, but you are the one being insulting and combative here.