3 ms·
It is not absolutely essential that lower income people eat beef. More importantly, the state should not be allowed to waste tax payer money on the ridiculous i
by littletimmy 12y ago
It is not absolutely essential that lower income people eat beef. More importantly, the state should not be allowed to waste tax payer money on the ridiculous idea that lower income people must have beef to eat.
Why on earth should my tax dollars go to a steak party?
- stbtrax 12y agoPardon the pun, but your complaints are incredibly rarified. No one's having a steak party, they're eating burgers and tacos in between their long shifts because of lack of fresh produce and time to cook it.
- littletimmy 12y agoThe government cannot subsidize fresh produce instead of the beef industry?
- mjevans 12y agoThe average voter feels a burger/taco/burrito is tastier and 'American'. The average voter probably has also not had /good/ experiences with salads that are actually tasty for reasons other than bacon. (Can we PLEASE stop adding bacon to /everything/ (at least as a default?); some of us just don't like the smokey taste.)
- ArkyBeagle 12y agoThey do. Heavily. There is an argument that says the Central Valley of California farmers basically funded Reagan's White House run in 1980. Carter was going after payments for all that water...
- venomsnake 12y agosocial and society have common root. The great unwashed also like to eat protein and voting power.