3 ms·
Interpreting your comment charitably, you are exactly right that it would be simpler had this been the case. Another fact: it would also be simpler had she not
by huu 12y ago
Interpreting your comment charitably, you are exactly right that it would be simpler had this been the case.
Another fact: it would also be simpler had she not been (allegedly) lied to about the marriage status of the co-worker.
- TheOtherHobbes 12y agoYou have to wonder about the ethics of someone who - by this account - was willing to tell obvious stupid lies about his marital status to get a few shags. If all of this is true, and it was the ethical baseline for co-worker relationships, what's the ethical baseline for client relationships?
- sigzero 12y agoWhy didn't she ask someone to verify. Sounds very shady to me. She knew he was married. I don't believe a lot of what she is saying now. Some but not all.
- spinlock 12y ago"married" was only one word in my comment. Replace it with "recently separated" or even "single" and it still equals incredibly inappropriate conduct. the reason you don't dip your pen in the company ink is that it gets messy.
- huu 12y agoI don't think we disagree. If it's valid to point out she shouldn't have been engaging in any kind of relationship with a co-worker, then it's equally valid to point out the same thing for the co-worker.