3 ms·
That's really impressive. Randomize even makes pretty compelling loops. It gets bogged down for me and starts stuttering and losing the beat when I have all th
by SwellJoe 12y ago
That's really impressive. Randomize even makes pretty compelling loops.
It gets bogged down for me and starts stuttering and losing the beat when I have all three tracks working (i7 system with 8GB RAM, running current Firefox developer release on a modern Linux system). I wouldn't know where to start on troubleshooting performance problems.
- errozero 12y agoI get that too on Firefox, I'm hoping to try out the web-worker idea suggested by meandave to fix it. At the moment it works much better on Chrome for some reason.
- padenot 12y ago(Firefox Web audio developer here) It's because, we've not optimised our implementation _at all_ (I'm exaggerating a bit but you get the idea). That said now that Firefox's implementation is in good shape in terms of spec compliance, we have started (very recently, one week or something) to work on performance.
- errozero 12y agoThat's good to hear. Just noticed your username and remembered you commented on a stack overflow thread of mine whilst I was developing this, about 24db filters: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28502028/web-audio-api-24db-filter http://stackoverflow.com/questions/28502028/web-audio-api-24...