3 ms·
So making sexual advances in a professional setting is A-OK, as long as you only do it once per person?
by pyrocat 12y ago
So making sexual advances in a professional setting is A-OK, as long as you only do it once per person?
- jarin 12y agoOf course not. If the way you ask people out on dates involves overt sexual advances, that's definitely not an appropriate way to do it in the workplace.
- ddoolin 12y agoSexual advances? Did we all miss something?
- zak_mc_kracken 12y agoIt's not sexual advances. It's not in a professional setting. Not saying that what he did is OK (it's not) but let's keep our facts straight.
- pyrocat 12y agoIt's making an advance for the eventual goal of sex. How is that not a sexual advance? How is an email chain between interviewee and interviewer, discussing your interview results, not a professional setting?
- ddoolin 12y agoPeople go to GREAT lengths for the "eventual goal of sex" all the time without it being labeled a sexual advance, including striking up what may seem like friendly conversation even though you may never have the slightest idea that their end game was actually to screw you (among many other things). Arguably the majority of anything that people do is for the eventual goal of sex. The e-mail "later that evening" was not discussing the interview results. It was a later email, presumably on his own.
- marrs 12y agoPeople go to GREAT lengths for the "eventual goal of sex" Like get married
- beenpoor 12y ago@pyrocat - You are making assumptions here that there was any quid pro quo involved. She was already rejected for the job. And then she was asked on a date. What was unethical and unprofessional was that he did it while being in a position of an interviewer.