3 ms·

I think she misinterpreted the Code of Conflict as she also tweeted: > Am I alone in reading the second para of [the Code of Conflict] … as deeply fucked up? Y

I think she misinterpreted the Code of Conflict as she also tweeted: > Am I alone in reading the second para of [the Code of Conflict] … as deeply fucked up? YOUR FEELINGS ARE UNACCEPTABLE. Wat. The second paragraph begins with: > If however, anyone feels personally abused, threatened, or otherwise uncomfortable due to this process, that is not acceptable. She seems to have understood it to mean it is unacceptable that you should feel uncomfortable and your feelings are unacceptable. I interpreted that is unacceptable that anyone should be made to feel uncomfortable by the review process which makes slightly more sense if one applies the principle of charity.

philh 12y ago
> She seems to have understood it to mean it is unacceptable that you should feel uncomfortable and your feelings are unacceptable. No she hasn't, she's just... I don't have any polite description of what she seems to be doing. "I think it's saying it's unacceptable if s/o makes you feel that way, but the 1st graf def sets up some apologist precedents" "I know what they actually mean, it's just a funny Freudian insight that no-one caught the bad grammar" "I'm pretty sure you read that very wrong" "I'm ok with this".