>what is the point of trying to argue that certain kinds of coerced sex are not rape? Because if financial coercion counts the same as physical coercion, we wi

>what is the point of trying to argue that certain kinds of coerced sex are not rape? Because if financial coercion counts the same as physical coercion, we will have to completely rebuild how our market functions or else say that financial coercion only equals physical coercion in certain situations, and then come up with a way to determine when it falls under each (at which point, we are back to arguing about if certain kinds of coercion are equal, including if all forms of coerced sex are equal).