3 ms·
Even more terse, there's the "0-clause BSD" (Toybox) license [1] and the Fair License [2]. The first one is essentially akin to releasing in the public domain,
by vezzy-fnord 12y ago
Even more terse, there's the "0-clause BSD" (Toybox) license [1] and the Fair License [2].
The first one is essentially akin to releasing in the public domain, whereas the second is the MIT/ISC license distilled down to its very core.
[1] http://landley.net/toybox/license.html http://landley.net/toybox/license.html
[2] http://opensource.org/licenses/fair http://opensource.org/licenses/fair
- Doctor_Fegg 12y agoTerser still, WTFPL: http://www.wtfpl.net/about/ http://www.wtfpl.net/about/ WTFPL has come in for some stick about the lack of a warranty clause, so last time I had to choose a licence, I perverted it into the FTWPL: https://github.com/systemed/tagmangle/blob/master/LICENCE.txt https://github.com/systemed/tagmangle/blob/master/LICENCE.tx...
- vezzy-fnord 12y agoThe Fair License is shorter. The WTFPL is about the same size as the Toybox license and has the same intent, but is far more legally ambiguous. I wouldn't use it for anything beyond toys.