3 ms·

Whenever someone gripes that rsync/scp is slow, it's usually because they didn't bother to look into proper solutions for their problem. rsync will barely fill

• ngoldbaum 12y ago
  You can also do well relying on the OS scheduler and networking stack by forking off many rsync processes using GNU parallel or xargs.
  • mattzito 12y ago
    Which is how I've done it in the past - I'm sure these days there's utilities that will do it for you, but I had a bunch of perl code that would fork off N threads out of a queue and as one exited successfully, kick off another worker. The issue with xargs back in the day was that you might need to run several hundred rsync processes, and suddenly launching 500+ processes in parallel made your server very very sad. So you needed some basic job queueing system.
    • hawski 12y ago
      $ man xargs --max-args=max-args -n max-args Use at most max-args arguments per command line. Fewer than max-args arguments will be used if the size (see the -s option) is exceeded, unless the -x option is given, in which case xargs will exit. ... --max-procs=max-procs -P max-procs Run up to max-procs processes at a time; the default is 1. If max-procs is 0, xargs will run as many processes as possible at a time. Use the -n option with -P; otherwise chances are that only one exec will be done.
      • mattzito 12y ago
        This was also...14?-ish years ago. Sometimes on Solaris 2.6 or 8 boxes. I am pretty sure xargs didn't have that flag back then (which is why I said, "back in the day").