I wonder how literal the parent was being. He seems to be walking the line. I think from the parents point of view he 'gets' what the original post was going af

I wonder how literal the parent was being. He seems to be walking the line. I think from the parents point of view he 'gets' what the original post was going after. Its just more... busting out the oscilloscope graphs to prove transparency at sub human audible levels while at the same time picking components because you can 'hear' the difference is a contradiction. Basic fundamental point is from a pure amplification of signal without distortion standpoint there are components that can get you there for a lot less effort today.