4 ms·
That's not the point. As someone who is actually a fairly big fan of Java, my concern is the damage this continues to do to Java's image in the minds of non-tec
by organsnyder 12y ago
That's not the point. As someone who is actually a fairly big fan of Java, my concern is the damage this continues to do to Java's image in the minds of non-technical users (especially those in executive positions).
- sigzero 12y agoThis has already been played out on Windows. It isn't damaging anything reputation wise.
- TeMPOraL 12y agoIndeed. Developers will keep chosing JVM for technical reasons, managers will keep choosing Java for business reasons, and the end-user doesn't have any choice. Want the application to run? Install Java.
- rdsnsca 12y agoNa... look for an app that doesn't need it. Haven't had Java on any of my machines for 5 years and i don't miss it one bit.
- moondowner 12y agoMany websites/webapps run on Java on the server side. Also some desktop apps come with Java bundled together. The user just installs the app and runs it.